By now many of you have seen SierraNevada's big green tall boys on the shelves of your local bottle
shop. Maybe you've been searching for some of that delicious GoldenRoad and only been able to find cans. No longer is the “Silver
Bullet” for tasteless macro brews and soda pop--its popularity
with the craft brewing community is growing everyday.
Much like the controversial “natural
cork vs synthetic” argument in the wine industry, canning has been
on the table of “flavor and tackiness” for some time now. What
are the arguments against canning and do they have any validity or
are they simply “old husbands tales”? I decided to do some
research and find out for myself.
c.2012 M. Mioduszewski. |
When I visited Oskar Blues Brewing out
in Colorado they walked me through the canning process explaining how
they ensure quality in flavor from the fermenting barrel to the can.
Much as with bottling, they fill the cans using a counter-flow CO2
displacement filler that pre-charges the cans with CO2
and then pours the beer in to push the CO2 out the top,
leaving a healthy foam head. Using a CO2 knife they cut
the head level to the top of the can and float the can top on it
before crimping it down. Unlike a bottle cap that is shaped more like
a dome leaving room for air, the can tops are flat leaving no room
between the carefully cured top and the foamy head. By keeping the
oxygen out they are keeping the beer fresher longer by effectively
preventing any oxidation.
As far as taste goes, canning seems to
be the best option for keeping all the good flavors in, and all the
bad flavors out of beer. Also, since oxygen is more limited in
canning than in bottling, the chances of your beer becoming oxidized
is decreased considerably. The other most obvious point to note is
that aluminum is impenetrable by sunlight--keeping those pesky UV
rays out of the beer. I think it's safe to say that canning is good
for the beer, and metal being an infinitely recyclable product it's
good for the earth too.
But wait there's more! I've heard many
a beer snob say “...but it looks tacky to drink out of a can!”
Don't worry I addressed this issue as well.
I consulted the co-founder of one of
the original can-only breweries in San Francisco: 21stAmendment's Shaun O'Sullivan, who complains “So many times I end up
talking more about the packaging than about the beer itself.” When
they first started production it seemed to them that canning being
environmentally sound and beer-safe was a no-brainer, but also that
it was perfect for people with an active lifestyle as well. “I want
to go sailing or hiking, not hauling a bunch of bottles with me
everywhere I go” says O'Sullivan, who points out the portability of
cans before and after the beer has been consumed. He also stresses
that unless you're out and about on an adventure, please kindly pour
your Monk's Blood into the appropriate glassware because “a can is
just a small keg, not always a drinking vessel” and we all love
beer from kegs!
16 comments:
you should challenge one of your assumptions 'and metal being an infinitely recyclable product it's good for the earth too.' if you go back a bit further into the production cycle you will see that the mining of aluminum is a pollution intensive process, bringing aluminum more in line with glass bottles.
fyi glass is recyclable too...
Thats not really a "vs" thats a clear pro cans text.
Thanks JP! I will definitely look in to it more. I will mention most of my information regarding recyclability was using Cork and Crown's own research and claims.
Always love the argument. People say beer quality is different in cans to bottles to Keg. They always say the like canned beer least, bottle next, then keg/draft. I then ask them, "What is a keg"? It's a giant can. I am an avid supporter of craft in cans. If a brewery has the same beer sitting on the shelf in a can and bottle, I buy the can every time.
Thanks for the comment Smurfe! My favorite thing is when there's a price difference between the two-- last time I ventured into a BevMo they have AVBC's Winter Solstice in a can for $2 less than in a bottle!
Say what you will, but get the same beer in a bottle, can, and from a keg and it will taste different. Also, if you drink right from the can, I find it tastes different than if pour that same beer into a glass. Someone throw some science at this and do a proper study!
A keg is stainless steel, holds more pressure and is whole when it is filled with beer, so can be completely purged with CO2... No "floating"the lid on top of foam before actually sealing the can. Not the same at all.
If you're able you should always pour your beer into it's proper glassware whether your beer is coming from a bottle or a can!
Aluminium is far more efficient to recycle than glass or plastic. Mining the rare earth elements that make hybrid car batteries is also pollution intensive. Doing the "green" thing often comes with trade-offs.
Nothing in this article about the BPA in can liners.
http://www.fledglingbrewer.com/rants/liner-notes-is-bpa-in-beer-cans-a-cause-for-concern/
I guess it's not a myth.
Cans are recyclable, but they aren't reusable.
Where I am beer bottles are washed and reused rather than melted and re-cast. Isn't this common practice elsewhere?
I would definitely not suggest removing bottles all together, however I think that we should give cans a chance and not automatically dismiss them simply because they are cans. As a homebrewer I save my bottles and use them for my own, however if I was to start doing production I would look into canning my product. Canning is about the same initial cost but the price per unit is significantly lower.
Someone mentioned earlier that they had at one time been able to sell their bottles back to the brewery- I think that if this were the case environmentally we would have an infrastructure worth exploring!
Glass breaks...it sucks when that drunk chick drops her beer over the side of the jacuzzi, shattering all over the ground. You didn't bring any footwear with you, just a towel and a hope to see some bikini-clad boobage. You smile and say "That's ok, happens all the time" and go to get another. Stepping out, you put your foot down on that shard that was hidden under the small leaf as it punctures your heel. Now you're trying to not call any attention, as you're bleeding like a stuck pig across your carpet, heading for the kitchen for her replacement beer. You slip and fall on your own blood, knocking yourself out on the kitchen counter. She gets bored and gets out, finding you unconscious. She's nice enough to call an ambulance, but not before grabbing your credit cards out of your wallet and racking up a huge charge at the nearby 24 hour Walmart.
This is why I drink from cans.
A lot of really good beer comes in cans nowadays, and those numbers are growing!! I have just started to homebrew so my last beer shopping trip made me buy beer that came in bottles so that I'll have a vast supply when the bottling stages rears its head. I was quite surprised how limited my selection of good beer was!
Have you heard about the new Samuel Adams developed can design? That has a lot of time, money and development to back it up and should be quite interesting!!
The article doesn't need to mention bpa, because bpa is chemically bonded in the liner, so unless you are heating up your full can of beer enough to break the bonds it isnt released into the beer.
I love how long we've been debating cans in the craftbeer world and I still hear all the same arguments from ignorance every time someone posts an article.
Do a blind taste test people! Pour the same beer into three identical glasses from glass, can, and tap and see if you can pick them apart.
Post a Comment